Not getting enough colon roughage with that, Plame decided to expose (i.e., ‘out’ herself, again) her anti-Israel/anti-Semite leanings on Twitter with an initially unexplained re-tweet of an anti-American-Jew article….
Then she has had to spend the day in a typical liberal/leftist mode of making the rest of us, outraged, just weren’t able to understand/recognize her nuance in plastering the link on her Twitter wall…
1) First of all, calm down. Re-tweets don't imply endorsement. Yes, very provocative, but thoughtful. Many neocon hawks ARE Jewish. https://t.co/m5oGgKPo2a
Val tells her backlashers that, hey, she’s part Jewish too, you know. So I guess that’s some sort of get-out-of-anti-Semitism-jail-free card, or something. Reminder, George Soros is Jewish too, as he was way back when he was a henchman for Hitler and the Nazis in WWII.
Now then, you may ponder why Barack Obama would go to such outside-the-box-of-legality and abuse his powers and the federal government in order to cover Hillary’s ass in her wrongdoings, especially given he really didn’t/doesn’t have that genuinely friendly of a relationship with Hillary (or Bill) Clinton. She was basically given the Secretary of State seat as a consolation prize, and a democrat party soothing, for taking her presidential hopes away in 2008. There had to be a quid pro quo between the two that allowed her to have carte blanche in her position at State and Obama would simply claim ‘plausible deniability’ should she ever get busted for doing things that were not legal, especially using her office to bolster the growth of money and outside influence from foreign entities into a possible Hillary Clinton administration. Well, that didn’t happen, obviously, and so, as the story link below lays out, Obama and his administration not only had to cover Hillary’s ass but his/their own in the massively erroneous abuse of power and the American government (which went beyond Hillary’s bullshit), but had to find a scapegoat to divert any scrutinizing attention away from his administration … and that was/is Donald Trump and his people. “Foreign influence” in the last election is chokingly laughable when you consider exactly who was in a position that carried more weight and contact(s) to set themselves up for an administration of ‘quid pro quo’. I mean, while Trump may have dabbled in possible business propositions/deals with Russia he didn’t have the power-backing to offer any sort of presidential deals. Consider who had already done Putin and Russia a huge solid. It wasn’t Trump with some hotel or businesses proposal. It was Hillary who sold Russia an inconceivable amount of U.S. uranium to Russia. Exactly who would you, using your common sense, think Putin and Russia would owe more to … Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton … were an outside foreign influence in a U.S. election to be given? Seriously.
However, I ponder something (possibly/probably) went wrong with whatever ‘gentleman’s agreement’ Clinton/Obama had with Russia, and either the ‘help’ Russia was supposed to give Clinton in her campaign to assure she would be the next POTUS was discarded for some yet unknown behind the scenes reason … or simply wasn’t good enough when coming up against a very pissed-off and Obama/Progressive democrat fatigue the American voter exercised in the voting booths. Remember, all the polling and pollster talking-heads had it horribly wrong in the lead-up to the November 2016 election. Even Hillary took typically democrat-voting states, like Wisconsin, for granted and didn’t spend any time or money campaigning there because she figured those states were in the bag for her.
Trump, on the other hand, loved the rabble-rousing at rallies in these blue collar states where the American worker/taxpayer had been taken for granted and even brushed off by the democrat party in favor of identity politics groups, like the LGBTQs. It is how Hillary and her sycophants so easily tagged the “white working class” as “a basket of deplorables” who are “irredeemable” because it was so much more up her alley to simply accuse the white working class as bigots and racists for being fed up with federal government overreach, forced compliance for accepting LGBTQ demands and the appeasing and decriminalizing of illegal aliens flooding into our nation and getting free rides and even some sort of ethereal citizenship. But I am guilty of digressing here on this.
By the way, this Obama tweet on Twitter has not aged well…
The Democrat scandals of the past few administrations have hinged on gross violations of political norms, elementary ethics and the rule of law that, out of context, were not technically illegal.
But it’s the pattern that makes the crime. It’s the context that shows the motive.
Obama Inc. compartmentalized its espionage operation in individual acts of surveillance and unmasking, and general policies implemented to aid both, that may have been individually legal, in the purely technical sense, in order to commit the major crime of eavesdropping on the political opposition.
When the individual acts of surveillance are described as legal, that’s irrelevant. It’s the collective pattern of surveillance of the political opposition that exposes the criminal motive for them.
If Obama spied on two of Trump’s campaign leaders, that’s not a coincidence. It’s a pattern.
A criminal motive can be spotted by a consistent pattern of actions disguised by different pretexts. A dirty cop may lose two pieces of evidence from the same defendant while giving two different excuses. A shady accountant may explain two otherwise identical losses in two different ways. Both excuses are technically plausible. But it’s the pattern that makes the crime.
Manafort was spied on under the Russia pretext. Bannon may have been spied on over the UAE. That’s two different countries, two different people and two different pretexts.
But one single target. President Trump.
It’s the pattern that exposes the motive.
When we learn the whole truth (if we ever do), we will likely discover that Obama Inc. assembled a motley collection of different technically legal pretexts to spy on Trump’s team.
Each individual pretext might be technically defensible. But together they add up to the crime of the century.
Obama’s gamble was that the illegal surveillance would justify itself. If you spy on a bunch of people long enough, especially people in politics and business, some sort of illegality, actual or technical, is bound to turn up. That’s the same gamble anyone engaged in illegal surveillance makes.
Businessmen illegally tape conversations with former partners hoping that they’ll say something damning enough to justify the risk. That was what Obama and his allies were doing with Trump.
It’s a crime. And you can’t justify committing a crime by discovering a crime.
If everyone were being spied on all the time, many crimes could be exposed every second. But that’s not how our system works. That’s why we have a Fourth Amendment.
Nor was Obama Inc. trying to expose crimes for their own sake, but to bring down the opposition…
Read the whole thing. To a common sense logic and reasoning mind it is staggeringly damning. Not only is there fire under all this smoke, but the toxic smoke itself is not to be ignored.
This shit right here would never-ever-ever have been treated so shruggingly dismissively were it a sitting republican administration doing the same exact thing to a democrat candidate for POTUS. JFC! The Bush administration was slammed against the fucking wall and forced to pull back on some of the Homeland Security surveillance practices they wanted to do post 9-11-01 terror attack in order to protect the country from another attack. And here we are with this singular political operation against an opponent. In-fucking-fathomable! And Obama and Clinton are getting away with it because the fucking MSM at every level imaginable is covering/covering-up/burying and even lying in their excusing of the Obama administration’s use and abuse of power for political means, especially in its last months in office after the successor to said office had been decided.
Stephen Kelly, former congressional affairs chief for the FBI, is working as a part of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to investigate Russia interference in the 2016 election, serving as a congressional liaison.
“Stephen Kelly is exactly who I would hire if I wanted to share as little information with Congress as possible,” a Capitol Hill staffer told the Daily Beast for a report published Tuesday evening. Before working at the FBI, Kelly worked for Sen. Patrick Leahy’s, D-Vt., Judiciary Committee staff.
Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort is calling on the Justice Department to release transcripts of any intercepted communications he may have had with foreigners. ‘Mr. Manafort requests that the Department of Justice release any intercepts involving him and any non-Americans so interested parties can come to the same conclusion as the DOJ — there is nothing there.’”
You know, this whole thing, the investigation of Flynn, the investigation into collusion with Russia, the special counsel now, as I mentioned earlier in the program, people that are deeply experienced in this and knowledgeable who I know and trust have come to the conclusion after all of this time with no evidence produced. Not only is there no evidence produced, Comey openly told people Trump was not a target, that Trump was not being pursued. They didn’t have enough evidence on Trump. They wouldn’t go public with that, but Comey had told congressional committees, and he had even told Trump, but he wouldn’t go public with it.
There isn’t any evidence. And yet it continues…
At the top of this pyramid that has permitted all this to happen is that bogus Trump dossier. Now, whether or not they knew from John Brennan, Obama’s CIA guy, James Clapper, the national security guy under Obama, whether they knew at the time that it was fake and made up or whether they accepted it as real doesn’t matter; they have acted on it as the foundation and basis to investigate Trump and his relationship and people with him and a relationship to Russia. And they fall back, “Well, we’ve got this, well, we can’t ignore this, look what this thing says.”
“Yeah, but it’s made up, it isn’t true. A bunch of Clinton donors paid for the thing.”
“Doesn’t matter. It says what it says, and we are responsible intelligence agency people, and we must investigate it.” It’s provided the basis for all of this. And it is bogus…
So, you would think an actual serious, focused investigation into an alleged possible collusion between Trump and Russia would only involve/encompass that time from when his campaign began and the election. Right? Not with this version of an independent investigation…
Warrant for Manafort raid reaches back 11 years, well outside the scope of Russia election interference probe. https://t.co/4JUWUwTuQs
… and to cover Hillary’s ass, her probable ‘collusion’ with Russia that could be/would be laid out in an email trial, conveniently ‘missing’, and hers and Bill’s Clinton Foundation‘s illegal doings, especially while she was at the State Department.
Now, the Manafort raid and what Mueller is doing, I don’t even think there’s any doubt what that’s about. I think that is about impeachment and destroying Trump as best they can. When I heard that they’re going out 10 years, 10, 11 years in the past looking at Trump’s life. I mean, he’s only been running for office since 2015. That’s two years. What’s 10 years? Well, that’s Trump businesses. That’s Trump tax returns.
I have no doubt that they are trying to wipe him out. And they’re not gonna stop until they have enough they think they can do it, and they’re trying to put pressure on people like Manafort to flip. Manafort has been told, by the way, that he’s gonna be indicted. That’s designed to intimidate and frighten him and to get him to accept a deal where he would flip for immunity. But it doesn’t sound like he’s there yet. He’s demanding, “You release what you found. I got nothing to hide. I didn’t do anything.”
At the top of this pyramid that has permitted all this to happen is that bogus Trump dossier. Now, whether or not they knew from John Brennan, Obama’s CIA guy, James Clapper, the national security guy under Obama, whether they knew at the time that it was fake and made up or whether they accepted it as real doesn’t matter; they have acted on it as the foundation and basis to investigate Trump and his relationship and people with him and a relationship to Russia. And they fall back, “Well, we’ve got this, well, we can’t ignore this, look what this thing says.”
“Yeah, but it’s made up, it isn’t true. A bunch of Clinton donors paid for the thing.”
“Doesn’t matter. It says what it says, and we are responsible intelligence agency people, and we must investigate it.” It’s provided the basis for all of this. And it is bogus.
There’s a hell of a lot of heap big there there to seriously investigate Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation than there is to investigate Donald Trump.
But it’s not about the truth. It’s about protecting The Swamp…
From the campus snowflakes needing their ‘safe spaces’ against “free speech” they don’t like or agree with, but fail horribly to see we are sick of hearing their lame-brained bullshit views, to the unhinged propagandist MSM, to butt-hurt Hollywood who worked so hard to raise funds for loser Hillary, the nation is in a state of dementia decline in our ability to intellectually and honestly discuss/debate the issues, and the direction this Republic should go. It drives people fucking nuts. Literally. I mean, seriously with this shit? How the hell are we supposed to discuss anything with this…
I am woman, hear my c**t roar??? But in this post-Obama “fundamental transformation” era this is exactly where we are. And the doltish media entities have no qualms about giving this level of insanity and continued push to ‘fundamentally transform’ us away from a Constitutional Republic to a mob rule ‘democracy’…
This is invariably the last refuge of domestic political arguments that aren’t working. https://t.co/TYFnbOZXTX
I’ve repeatedly noted that half of the country is clinically insane, driven mad by the election of Donald Trump and the blow to their own egos, their sense that they are the Masters of the Universe and control their fellow countrymen, producing daily neurotic spasms on Twitter, and are virally infecting normal people with their toxic mental derangement…
Okay, let me talk about how to exploit that, or how it will do its own exploiting for us.
In the old days, the media liked to pretend that it was conservatives who were super-crazy-ideological, and that liberals were not even liberals at all, they were non-ideological and non-partisan creatures, who only reluctantly engage in politics, only compelled to engage with it at all by their deep inner goodness to do what’s best for everyone.
But not political. Oh dear, not that.
You may remember when conservatives objected to being identified as a “conservative advocate” by the media, whereas the out-and-proud liberal they were squared off against was identified only as “an expert” in whatever policy field they were debating.
Obama pretended to be non-ideological and non-partisan, despite being rabidly ideological and ruthlessly partisan. He was forever painting those disagreeing with him on policy for being “political” in their thinking, whereas he, you see, was just thinking rationally and lucidly.
[…]
There’s a reason the media and left-liberals-who-don’t-wish-to-acknowledge-they’re-left-liberals do this. It’s because people — most normal people, anyway — have a deep suspicion of politics and politically minded people.
If you can paint your opponent as political, while fighting him nail and tooth while pretending that you are yourself not political, you’ve taken a massive first step towards persuading an audience, because the first thing you need to do to persuade someone is seem “relatable,” and basically Just Like Them, and as they themselves like to believe they’re non-political, you establish something more important than logic and reason can when you pretend to match their personality and emotional state.
Example #1 (in a loooong line of examples): Late night hack Jimmy Kimmel last night who tries to act as if he doesn’t come out five nights a week and liberally slather his monologue and show in one-sided politics…
These people have political Alzheimer’s. Go back to the writing/arm-twisting/closed-door GOP locked out dealing/lack of hearings/democrat last minute pages adding and refusing of anything the GOP wanted added the damn democrats did with ObamaCare. And Kimmel has the audacity to complain about ‘reading the bill’? Where the hell was he all those years ago when these assholes who were crafting this massive takeover of the nation’s healthcare where not only going forward whithout reading the ObamaCare bill, but insisting it didn’t need read and, by all their reasoning, shouldn’t be read before shoving it down this nation’s collective throats…
Hey, our side did read the bill and warn against it, but we were called “racists/bigots/extremists” because we warned you this, this shit premise right here was a damn lie…
The fact is that over the last several years since ObamaCare came in existence millions of Americans, of all stripes and wellness/conditions, have not only lost their “liked” healthcare plans and doctors but are not saving money buying into ObamaCare plans but paying HUGE increases in premiums and high deductibles to which they actually never have ObamaCare kick in because they never reach them, all the while paying the higher premiums. And the ObamaCare system is horrifically collapsing with Americans having as little as one ‘choice’, and that’s if they even have a choice at all.
Jimmy Kimmel can shove his rant where he absolutely needs a proctologist to go look for his head.
Example #2: :Let’s look at Ace’s view of ‘nervous breakdowns’ in the nation. Nobody does crazy like Hollywood liberals/leftists do crazy, and that’s not just on the screen. No, these people have gone beyond unhinged activists and become “1984 Room 101” forceful propagandists…
The Hulu series The Handmaid’s Tale won eight Emmys on Sunday night, a sweep fueled, in part, by the widely accepted belief in liberal America that the show tells us something about the Trump era.
Based on the 1985 novel by Margaret Atwood, the series depicts a misogynist dystopia. Christian fundamentalists have established a theocracy that — after an environmental debacle craters the birth rate — forces fertile women, called handmaids, into sexual slavery.
Set in contemporary America, the show combines the atmosphere of The Scarlet Letter with 1984. It is bleak, plodding, heavy-handed, and occasionally gripping. What has given it extra oomph is the trope that it is relevant to Trump’s America. This is a staple of the commentary, and everyone involved in the show’s production pushes the notion.
According to Atwood, people woke up after Trump’s election “and said we’re no longer in a fantasy fiction.” The series is indeed highly relevant — as a statement on the fevered mind of progressives.
The president doesn’t want to impose his traditional sexual morality because, for starters, he doesn’t have any to impose. His critics are mistaking a thrice-married real estate mogul who has done cameos in Playboy videos and extensive interviews on The Howard Stern Show with Cotton Mather. He isn’t censorious; he’s boorish.
“I thought this could be a great cautionary tale,” director Reed Morano says of the show. “We don’t think about how women are treated in other countries as much as we should, and I guess I thought this would raise awareness.” Fair enough. The Handmaid’s Tale does have something to tell us about, say, Saudi Arabia. But, in an uncomfortable fact for Christian-fearing feminists, none of the world’s women-hating theocracies are Christian.
Elisabeth Moss, who won an Emmy for her portrayal of handmaid Offred, warns of “things happening with women’s reproductive rights in our own country that make me feel like this book is bleeding over into reality.”
What this means is that Republicans want to defund the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, and roll back Obamacare’s contraception mandate. If they succeed, this would mean less government intervention in matters of sexual morality, rather than more.
The progressive mind is unable to process that it has won the culture war in a rout (except for abortion, where conservatives are trying to chip away at our extremely liberal laws at the margins). We live in a country where Christian bakers get harried by government for politely declining to bake cakes for gay weddings, yet progressives still believe we are a few steps away from enslaving women.
Again, read the whole thing.
No, Hollywood/leftists, we are NOT in the era of “The Handmaid’s Tale”. But you keep on keeping-on with that bullshit premise. In the mean time, while you liberally/Progressively embrace Islam/Sharia and all its exotic trappings you should, but won’t, be aware everything in “The Handmaid’s Tale” is in existence in that culture, dumb-asses.
Example #3: Do as I say, not as I do … or don’t do. This British actor was pissed at the British government for its decision to limit the number of Syrian refugees into the country. Cumberbatch, very wealthy and well-off indeed, received backlash telling him to house refugees at his home. Two years later:
[P]eople were saying, ‘You’ve got a home, why don’t you house refugees?’ And we did look into it. But we had, then, a very new baby – maybe four or five months old.
Maybe people had a point. I understand why some might think I should be housing people instead of complaining about a government not doing it. But I was trying to raise awareness that we can do more as a society. Because I do feel we are able to do more than just recovering bodies.
Once again it’s the celebrity ‘activist’ premise that they can fully break the rules they themselves insist others live by while they push the cause/agenda (See carbon footprint big footers: Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio). But here’s the even bigger thorn in this asshole’s reasoning … He feared for his young baby in bringing a ‘refugee’ into his home? Oh, boy he got a pass on that one with the reporter. But to hell with our kids, eh? Bless his limo-lefty heart.
“For everybody at home watching this and acting like y’all don’t see what’s going on out there, you gotta open your eyes,” he noted at the beginning of his speech. “Don’t think just because they’re coming at the African-Americans and they’re coming at the Jewish community and they’re coming at the Hispanics that it can’t be you.”
Yeah. Fuck you, mental midget. Which leads us to this…
Hey, next time a liberal says, “They’re not ‘illegal’ aliens. They’re undocumented immigrants.” ask them ‘what documents don’t they have’ and ‘why are they NOT seeking out and acquiring said documents’?” You don’t call somebody driving without a license an ‘undocumented driver’. Or a doctor practicing without a degree/license an ‘undocumented medical worker’. No, you arrest them, and in some instances sue the shit out of them, and they go to jail.
