Actually, in the womb no one can hear a baby scream.
Hey, have-at-it. But why do you need horse pills when apparently abortion pills, as demonstrated months ago in DC by pro-abortion protestors, are available for gleefully popping like Tic Tacs. I mean, if you’re making some half-assed dis at folks who want the freedom to take Ivermectin when they are sick with the China plague you’re not on the race track you think you’re on. But go ahead.
And so, after these last two years of bullying and mandating “get vaccinated or be banished from society” we’re back to “my body my choice?” And don’t throw that “apples and oranges” missive at me or anyone else pointing this out. Either we have body autonomy from the government or we don’t … and clearly throughout our US Constitution the Founding Fathers agreed that we do— agreed with God.
Kevin Downey, Jr: Give Them an Inch and They Want the Third Trimester: How the Left Made This Happen
When they are at their most unhinged mouth-frothing outraged they are brutally honest about their agenda… Free and open abortion on demand with no regulations or restrictions at any time during pregnancy and post live-birth. And now they demand the fourth trimester…
Greg Bert: California Bill Would Allow Killing Babies in Infanticide Up to 28 Days After Birth
California policymakers who make up the “Future of Abortion Council” just dropped a bombshell. They intend to not only codify the killing of unborn children throughout all nine months of pregnancy but to decriminalize killing newborns days or even weeks after birth.
New language added to AB 2223 last week revealed the disturbing intent. The proposed legislation would shield a mother from civil and criminal charges for any “actions or omissions” related to her pregnancy, “including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death.” Although definitions of “perinatal death” vary, all of them include the demise of newborns seven days or more after birth.
The bill from Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks additionally protects anyone who “aids or assists a pregnant person in exercising” these rights. It also allows a woman to sue any police department or legal authority which arrests or charges her for hurting or killing her child under provisions of the bill…
Twitchy: ‘Please stop having white children’: Here are some more ‘extremely stupid and racist’ hot takes from liberal who briefly nuked her account
Oh, nooooze, Joe:
Twitchy: Oh no, he’s said too much: Joe Biden accidentally drives a stake through the heart of the pro-abort movement … Well, it’s, ya know, Joe.
Brooke Singman: Biden ‘not prepared’ to leave right to privacy determination to ‘whims’ of ‘local areas’: Biden warned that if Roe v. Wade is overturned, a ‘whole range of rights are in question’
The president went on to say that “one of the reasons” why he voted against “a number of members of the Court” was because “they refuse to acknowledge that there’s a 9th Amendment.”
The Ninth Amendment states that the “enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
According to the Annenberg Classroom, the Ninth Amendment is a “constitutional safety net intended to make clear that individuals have other fundamental rights, in addition to those listed in the First through Eighth Amendments.”
“They refuse to acknowledge there’s a right to privacy,” the president said Tuesday. “I mean, there are so many fundamental rights that are affected by that.”
The president added: “And I’m not prepared to leave that to the whims and the — and the — of the public at the moment in local areas.”…
Got that? The very same bloke that constantly insists and boasts that “81 million voted for” him for POTUS in 2020 cannot and should not be trusted or empowered to vote state by state for or against abortion to be legal in their state(s). No, it can only be decided and mandated by nine unelected judges in black robes. Not by the American people in a Federalist republic.
Uh! What’s this??
NYT (3/29/19): When Joe Biden Voted to Let States Overturn Roe v. Wade … Would you look at that? Just lookatit!
Victoria Balara: Fox News Poll: Just over half favor banning abortions after 15 weeks
Just a year ago polling also showed that the higher the trimester of the pregnancy the higher those polled are against abortion, especially with 80% thinking it should be illegal in late-term/full-term in pregnancy, and even higher in live-born abortions. And these high percentage numbers against late-term and live-birth abortion can even be seen in democrats and young people.
Oh, fuuuuudge!!! Don’t tell old Joe!
Twitchy: ‘Constitution does NOT include a right to abortion’: Thread describing Alito’s ‘thoughtful, scholarly, and thorough’ draft will make you FIST-PUMP
Oh, the blatantly and willfully ignorant assholes heating and shit-stinking the chamber seats of both houses of the US Congress…
Robert Spencer: New Leftist Talking Point: It Won’t Stop With Abortion; the Right Is Going to Take All Our Toys Away
Lindsay Kornick: Rep. Jayapal claims Supreme Court justices ‘do not have the right’ to overturn Roe v. Wade: Democrats condemned the Supreme Court after draft opinion leaks … Ohhhh! No, surrrry, Jay. But thanks for playing.
Peter Hasson: Black Republicans slam Swalwell for saying GOP oppose interracial marriage: ‘I’m in an interracial marriage’: Rep. Byron Donalds calls Swalwell ‘fool’ for interracial marriage comment
RGB, the leftist feminists’ goddess is about to get ‘canceled’. Wait for it…
Tyler O’Neill: UNSTABLE FOUNDATION – Alito’s SCOTUS leaked draft abortion opinion echoes and confirms Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s prescient warning about: Ginsburg firmly supported abortion, but she lamented the Court’s decision to unilaterally create a new ‘regime’ on the subject … Over the decades during the abortion debates I’ve always heard more stable minds, even some more intellectually honest liberals, agree that Roe v. Wade was ‘bad law’. Not so much that legalizing abortion was bad, but the SCOTUS involvement and final decision was pretty bad. While that is becoming undeniable amid this current dust-up, as an adult with even a grade school level knowledge of the three branches of government, the separation of powers, what a judge is and is not supposed to do, it never made sense that when Roe was ruled on decades ago it was deemed law somehow legislated by the SCOTUS Justices/judges.
I&I Ed Board: Sen. Markey Is A Dangerous Insurrectionist — Says The Supreme Court Was ‘Stolen’!
Stephen Kruiser: The Morning Briefing: Democrats Find a New Lunatic Fringe After SCOTUS Leak
Athena Thorne: Obamas Urge Their Followers to Take to the Streets to Save Roe
Well, that is exactly what the well-funded organized street rats are doing. Hitting the streets, inflicting violence on anyone in their way of killing and celebrating the killing of innocent helpless babies…
Lawrence Richard: Los Angeles: At least 1 police officer injured during clash with abortion rights protesters: LA police say people in the crowd started throwing rocks and bottles at officers
Well, there’s your other ‘up-side’ should the SCOTUS overturn Roe. Their terms are acceptable.
It’s real not hard at all to get out a magic marker and connect the dots on this, from SCOTUS leak to orchestrated immediately following Politico “BREAKING NEWS” publication to coordinated dem and MSM breathless outrage to fundraising and frantic push to completely diminish the Supreme Court…
Joe Schoffstall: Liberal dark money group with Biden admin ties capitalizes on SCOTUS leak to push court-packing agenda: Jen Psaki, Biden’s press secretary, previously served as an outside adviser to Demand Justice
Andrew Stiles: CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin Worried SCOTUS Could Take Away His Right To Bribe Mistress To Get Abortion: FACT CHECK: Leaked opinion would have no bearing on Toobin’s ability to bang a colleague’s daughter and pressure her to end the pregnancy (in New York state) … D’OH!!!!!
Andrew C. McCarthy: The Supreme Court’s integrity demands its leaker be prosecuted — and the decision released now
It would be difficult to cite a higher American public interest than conducting a criminal investigation of the Supreme Court leak. The current security of the justices and the long-term viability of the court as an institution depend on it.
It was entirely appropriate for the court to confirm that Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion in the Mississippi abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, is not at this point an authoritative ruling of the court. There could understandably be public confusion on that point, so it was incumbent on the court to clarify.
But there are unwelcome consequences to even appropriate actions. The obvious one here is that with the court having assured everyone that there is a draft opinion but it is not yet a final ruling, radicals prone to intimidation tactics know that now is the time to act.
Moreover, they have targets. Besides Alito, four conservative justices have been reported as members of a majority that favors overruling Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey — Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
This is why the opinion must be formally issued forthwith. The viability of the court as a deliberative judicial institution is at stake. If the opinion or the vote tabulation were to change in any meaningful way, it would appear that the justices caved to intimidation tactics — which would simply breed more intimidation tactics. We’d have not the rule of law but the law of the jungle.
Equally important, the security of the justices is at risk. Until the ruling is formally issued, the radical left — the people who destroy such norms as judicial confidentiality, the ones vowing to “burn it down” if they don’t get their way — will believe it can still change the outcome by intimidating one or more of these five justices.
That’s how serious this is and why the leak must be regarded as a criminal offense worthy of investigation, prosecution and imprisonment.
The leak is a corrupt act that was patently intended to influence the outcome of the Dobbs case. That makes it a criminal obstruction of that judicial proceeding. Obstruction is the charge that the Biden Justice Department has brought against some of the most serious Capitol riot defendants, whose corrupt acts were intended to influence and intimidate Congress into changing the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. It is even more clearly applicable to court cases — we don’t call it obstruction of justice for nothing.
Note, in addition, that the justices, their clerks and administrative court personnel who support judicial operations are not private actors. They are government officials and employees. The records they generate, including draft opinions that are refined into eventual rulings, are not their private property. Those records belong to the United States.
Under federal law, it is a crime to embezzle government records or to convert them to one’s own use. The leaker, who took the draft opinion — the government’s property — and disseminated it outside the court’s established processes to someone not authorized to access it, has stolen a record and converted it to his or her own political purposes. That’s a crime…
John Daniel Davidson: The Constitutional Crisis That Roe v. Wade Set In Motion Is Now Upon Us: Roe sowed the seeds of a crisis that will end with America ceasing to be divided: we will become all one thing or all the other.
Don’t listen to and/or believe the demo-commies and the MSM a-holes making this claim…
Jonathan Turley: No, Justices Did Not Commit Perjury in Their Confirmation Hearings When Asked About Roe
Like this:
Like Loading...
The Universal Spectator 
You must be logged in to post a comment.