Leave a comment

No, Seriously … Because It IS a Fucking Witch Hunt…

It is blindingly clear this whole thing had nothing to do with a Trump-Russia collusion, but is being used as a political opposition tool to try to influence the mid-term elections in favor of the impeachment-slobbering democrats to take the majority and the House. Paul Ryan’s untimely announcement yesterday won’t help either. The GOP RINOs are traitors…

AoSHQ: Senate Judiciary Committee to Consider Bill To Forbid Trump from Firing Mueller, Which Would be Both Bipartisan and Unconstitutional

A friend snarked, “Oh? Is this bill also a constitutional amendment?”

The legislative branch cannot intrude into executive branch hiring and firing decisions.

The Independent Counsel law was widely viewed as unconstitutional precisely because it vested an executive function — a prosecutor and entire staff — in a non-executive branch (under the supervision of a three-judge judiciary branch panel).

That law was considered so constitutionally infirm that every independent counsel was seconded by a so-called “shadow prosecutor” from the executive branch, so that if any convictions were challenged on the grounds that the Constitution vests the executive power in the executive branch, not an counsel independent of the executive branch under the direction of judiciary branch personnel, the prosecutors could say “Hey, we were back-stopped by an actual legal executive branch prosecutor. So that makes it legit.”

But at least there was a law in that case. In the current case, Congress wants to intrude on the executive branch by saying the executive branch has no power to fire its own employees — its own inferior officers.

Rosenstein lets Nunes, Gowdy review FBI memo that kick-started Russia probe

DOJ Caved, but Jordan Says Impeachment Threat Remains: Resignation, contempt of Congress also still ‘on the table’ for Rosenstein, Sessions and Wray if they don’t comply fully with congressional subpoenas

Dershowitz: Rosenstein Must Be Recused

First, former U.S. attorney Joe diGenova said that President Trump should fire Rosenstein before Dershowitz chimed in that he’d “do it differently.”

“I think Rod Rosenstein is recused,” he told host Sean Hannity. “I don’t think he can serve on an investigation in which he will end up being the key witness.”

“If I were a lawyer for Donald Trump, and I am not, I am just saying what I would say about anybody, I would be making a motion in front of a judge,” he explained. “First I’d make it in the Justice Department, to recuse Rosenstein. Then I’d make it in front of a judge. You cannot be a prosecutor and you cannot be a witness in the same case.”

REPORT: FBI Confirms Strzok and Page STILL HAVE Top Secret Security Clearance

REPORT: FBI Was Looking for Information on ‘Access Hollywood’ Tape in Cohen’s Office: “The search warrant also sought evidence of whether the lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, tried to suppress damaging information about Mr. Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign.”

Reminder- NOT “Russia collusion” related: Mueller Asks Judge To Subpoena 35 Witnesses For Manafort Trial

Meanwhile, former FBI mob boss (hey, he started it), James Comey, has a new novel— er, book coming out and is currently on the fawning liberal MSM tour to promote it … ahead of what is anticipated to be a damning DOJ IG report soon to break…

Ben Shapiro makes Comey look like the grandstanding, glory-seeking jackass he REALLY is

MORE:

Glenn Reynolds:

THEY TOLD ME IF TRUMP WERE ELECTED, JACKBOOTED FEDS WOULD BE INVESTIGATING THE EDITORIAL POLICIES OF NATIONAL NEWSPAPERS. And they were right! “In one instance, The Enquirer bought but did not publish a story about an alleged extramarital relationship years earlier with the presidential candidate, an unusual decision for a scandal sheet. The federal inquiry could pose serious legal implications for the president and his campaign committee. It also presents thorny questions about A.M.I.’s First Amendment protections, and whether its record in supporting Mr. Trump somehow opens the door to scrutiny usually reserved for political organizations.”

Everyone knows that “editorial decisions” aren’t protected under the First Amendment if they might help Trump. And there’s absolutely no such thing as a Deep State.

Watergate Every Week: Using the FBI to Suppress a Political Revolution: From Steele to Mueller, the cost of overturning the 2016 election.

Why The Raid On Trump’s Lawyer Might Be A Fishing Expedition

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: