Watch it a couple of times.
He sure did lay out a very strong case of guilt.
Listen to Dir. Comey’s statement again. It sounds as though he deliberately laid out a solid case against Clinton, knowing full-well “intent” was not needed under the rules and regulations she was under. Even his remarks about ‘were this anybody else’ and other carefully placed landmine remarks seem meant to put the idea of a political ‘fix’ out there.
His blatant egging-on of us is even quite telling…
Something other than the obvious is going on.
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Speaker of The House response: